Discover postsExplore captivating content and diverse perspectives on our Discover page. Uncover fresh ideas and engage in meaningful conversations
"Tyson James - Monkeypoxs ft Bryson Gray"
"Tyson James - Monkeypoxs ft Bryson Gray"
[Forwarded from StormCloudsGathering]
[ Video ]
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's latest speech confirms what the "conspiracy theorists" have been saying for years :
"Rapid changes are taking place in the global monetary system that may affect the international role of the dollar in the future.
A U.S. CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency) could also potentially help maintain the dollar's international standing."
Translation: They know that raising interest rates won't stop inflation. They also know that the sovereign debt crisis that it sets off will force the world to move away from the dollar. Introducing a CBDC won't stop this, but they hope it will allow them to keep the population under control. This is the real driving force behind the "Great Reset". This is why they can't abandon their plan no matter how badly it has gone so far. They are trapped.
@StormCloudsGathering
Discussion: @OpenSourceTheNews
[Forwarded from StormCloudsGathering]
In part one of our takedown on "terrain theory" (https://t.me/StormCloudsGathering/756) we addressed those who believe that NEITHER bacteria NOR viruses ever cause sickness. And yes, there are channels with significant followings propagating this idea. These are often the same channels pushing flat earth and similar nonsense. For the virology portion of this takedown we will address the most reasonable contingent of the terrain theorist spectrum: the ones that think that bacterial infections may be real, but propose an alternative interpretation of the relationship between viruses and illness (the Kaufman / Bailey crowd).
Advocates of the terrain narrative commit a blatant logical fallacy from the onset by misplacing the BURDEN OF PROOF and misrepresenting the weight of their arguments. In fact to call it "Terrain Theory" is inappropriate. It should be called the Terrain Hypothesis, because that's exactly what it is (and not a very strong one at that). The mechanisms described by the terrain hypothesis may be relevant in some specific illnesses (AIDS for example), but they certainly don't come close to disproving germ theory or even explaining the full range of viral or virus-like phenomena.
But even if the Terrain Hypothesis offered a complete explanation for every single phenomenon that is currently believed to be caused by viruses, to merely make such a claim would never be sufficient. This is not how science works. The scientific method allows for anyone to propose a new hypothesis. But before that hypothesis can rise to the level of a theory it must be tested thoroughly and the results must be repeatable. The kind of paradigm shift that the Terrain Hypothesis proposes never happens quickly. Change of this magnitude takes years. Those propagating the terrain hypothesis seem to think that they can skip all these steps and claim victory from the onset. From there they make the case that this new world view should be pushed to the forefront in the fight for medical freedom. Because if people can be convinced that viruses don't cause disease then the rest of the pandemic narrative falls apart, right? Not so fast.
Trouble is, the terrain hypothesis doesn't unite the freedom movement. It divides us. And it divides us over a debate that will not be settled this year or even this decade. A genocide is underway (and is about to escalate) yet somebody thought it would be a good strategy to open up a new front by trying to overthrow "Germ Theory" at the same time? Seriously? This approach is so utterly stupid and counterproductive that the enemy would have an obvious motive to encourage it. It distracts from the simple facts at hand: Coercive medical experimentation is wrong. Medical apartheid is wrong. Those in power have committed crimes against humanity and must be held accountable. To succeed we must unite on our strongest positions. To muddy the waters with an argument about whether viruses or bacteria cause disease is asinine.
It is that combination of sloppy logic and bad strategy that justifies this harsh response: Any so called "thought leader" who understands the scientific method so poorly, and who is drawn to such a terrible strategy, should be permanently disqualified from any and all leadership roles. Their lack of discernment is dangerous.
The terrain hypothesis doesn't deserve any more attention, so we won't waste time debating it. All focus should be on preparing for the shockwaves ahead.
"Do not answer a fool according to his folly,
Or you will also be like him.
Answer a fool as his folly deserves,
That he not be wise in his own eyes." Proverbs 26:4
@StormCloudsGathering
Discussion: @OpenSourceTheNews
[Forwarded from StormCloudsGathering]
In part one of our takedown on "terrain theory" (https://t.me/StormCloudsGathering/756) we addressed those who believe that NEITHER bacteria NOR viruses ever cause sickness. And yes, there are channels with significant followings propagating this idea. These are often the same channels pushing flat earth and similar nonsense. For the virology portion of this takedown we will address the most reasonable contingent of the terrain theorist spectrum: the ones that think that bacterial infections may be real, but propose an alternative interpretation of the relationship between viruses and illness (the Kaufman / Bailey crowd).
Advocates of the terrain narrative commit a blatant logical fallacy from the onset by misplacing the BURDEN OF PROOF and misrepresenting the weight of their arguments. In fact to call it "Terrain Theory" is inappropriate. It should be called the Terrain Hypothesis, because that's exactly what it is (and not a very strong one at that). The mechanisms described by the terrain hypothesis may be relevant in some specific illnesses (AIDS for example), but they certainly don't come close to disproving germ theory or even explaining the full range of viral or virus-like phenomena.
But even if the Terrain Hypothesis offered a complete explanation for every single phenomenon that is currently believed to be caused by viruses, to merely make such a claim would never be sufficient. This is not how science works. The scientific method allows for anyone to propose a new hypothesis. But before that hypothesis can rise to the level of a theory it must be tested thoroughly and the results must be repeatable. The kind of paradigm shift that the Terrain Hypothesis proposes never happens quickly. Change of this magnitude takes years. Those propagating the terrain hypothesis seem to think that they can skip all these steps and claim victory from the onset. From there they make the case that this new world view should be pushed to the forefront in the fight for medical freedom. Because if people can be convinced that viruses don't cause disease then the rest of the pandemic narrative falls apart, right? Not so fast.
Trouble is, the terrain hypothesis doesn't unite the freedom movement. It divides us. And it divides us over a debate that will not be settled this year or even this decade. A genocide is underway (and is about to escalate) yet somebody thought it would be a good strategy to open up a new front by trying to overthrow "Germ Theory" at the same time? Seriously? This approach is so utterly stupid and counterproductive that the enemy would have an obvious motive to encourage it. It distracts from the simple facts at hand: Coercive medical experimentation is wrong. Medical apartheid is wrong. Those in power have committed crimes against humanity and must be held accountable. To succeed we must unite on our strongest positions. To muddy the waters with an argument about whether viruses or bacteria cause disease is asinine.
It is that combination of sloppy logic and bad strategy that justifies this harsh response: Any so called "thought leader" who understands the scientific method so poorly, and who is drawn to such a terrible strategy, should be permanently disqualified from any and all leadership roles. Their lack of discernment is dangerous.
The terrain hypothesis doesn't deserve any more attention, so we won't waste time debating it. All focus should be on preparing for the shockwaves ahead.
"Do not answer a fool according to his folly,
Or you will also be like him.
Answer a fool as his folly deserves,
That he not be wise in his own eyes." Proverbs 26:4
@StormCloudsGathering
Discussion: @OpenSourceTheNews
The Engineered Stagflationary Collapse Has Arrived – Here’s What Happens Next
"First and foremost, no, the Fed is not motivated by profits, at least not primarily. The Fed is able to print wealth at will, they don’t care about profits – They care about power and centralization. Would they sacrifice “the golden goose” of US markets in order to gain more power and full bore globalism? Absolutely. Would central bankers sacrifice the dollar and blow up the Fed as an institution in order to force a global currency system on the masses? There is no doubt; they’ve put the US economy at risk in the past in order to get more centralization.’"
https://alt-market.us/the-engi....neered-stagflationar
The most charitable way to read Biden’s sanctions is that he’s an idiot of the first water.
Biden might be an idiot, but his back room advisors aren’t.
They knew that pushing Russia out of the SWIFT bank payment system would drive Putin & Xi closer together.
It would also chip off a big chunk of the global petrodollar dominance & formally begin its demise. When that happens, USA will realise it’s not as rich as it thinks. All my life USA has benefitted from “exorbitant privilege”, because they can run budget & structural deficits nobody else can. That’ll stop.
Fossil fuel shortages in USA are unconnected to Russia & almost solely self inflicted through malign policy decisions at home.
Western Europe had really damaged itself, in the short term, irreparably. Germany will not only be cold & quiet, but there are no substitute fuels immediately available.
Whether Russia is a cooperative partner behind the scenes in bringing about the end of days in the West, I don’t know. But they’re coming, probably in the next year.
For the first time ever, our leaders have set the controls for the heart of the sun & pressed the button. There’s no coming back from here, because they’ve no intention of helping recovery, only destruction.
If you’re not frightened, you’re already close enough to death that this doesn’t matter.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/....meet-new-boss-putin-
