Graham Phillips: The UK government have bypassed British law and the tenets of the Magna Carta

"Sanctions have an effect on several levels, but basically, it’s the UK government bypassing British law, the tenets of the Magna Carta even, which state:

–  “No free man shall be seized, imprisoned, dispossessed, outlawed, exiled or ruined in any way, nor in any way proceeded against, except by the lawful judgement of his peers and the law of the land.”

"I don’t like hyperbole, however in my situation, a precedent has been set – if the UK government don’t like you, they can punish you without any recourse to the judicial system. So, effectively, to punish me, they’ve abolished UK law, for every British citizen. Just, don’t expect to read that on the BBC or Guardian."

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk..../graham-philips-the-

Solar Inertial Motion (SIM)
Not only can the planets move in relation to the Sun, but also the Sun in relation to the planets, or all the objects in relation to the joint centre of gravity (their barycentre) – the Sun is not, and won’t be, just a non-moving centre!

Solar Inertial Motion:
The real reason for medium-long term climate change - Professor Of Physics & Mathematics at Northumbria University & solar physicist Valentina Zharkova explains:
t.me/robinmg/22142

Copied from Robin Minotti:

the CO2 scam and its proponents remind me of religious sects where leaders (usually corrupt thieves) tell their followers to do meaningless things with alleged ritualistic meaning (like reducing emissions of something that makes up 0,04% of atmosphere)

So, learned an interesting fact the other day . Carbon dioxide?‍?️, the focus of eradication to stop ‘climate change’ ( formerly known as…. ‘the weather’), accounts for just 0.038 % of the earths atmosphere.
Of that 0.038%, less than 3 % is attributable to human involvement.
So if we ALL gave up our cars, industry, heating ,energy and food and basically wiped ourselves and our offspring of the planet, we would save 0.00114% of Co2 spewing catastrophically into the atmosphere!
Wow. ? . That 0.00114 % is sure to make a measurable difference.?
Say it again ,zero …point… zero …zero …one …one.. four… of one percent.?

And ..that is the same CO2 that is an essential nutrient for almost every plant based life form on the planet!?
Oh…. and Methane, (the second biggest ‘greenhouse gas’)accounts for…. just 0.00018% of the earths atmosphere!!!!?

D’ya think Climate Change could, just maybe another bull****, hyped up,money making Globalist scam??

JFK

Carbon-Bank CEO Barbara Baarsma thinks that each citizen should have a limited number of carbon emission rights—credits that they can buy and sell through a "Carbon Wallet."

If poor people don't use their credit, they can sell it to rich people.

The UK Online Safety Bill Attacks Free Speech and Encryption

Subjective Standards for Censorship 

"If the Online Safety Bill passes, the UK government will be able to directly silence user speech, and even imprison those who publish messages that it doesn’t like. The bill empowers the UK’s Office of Communications (OFCOM) to levy heavy fines or even block access to sites that offend people. We said last year that those powers raise serious concerns about freedom of expression. Since then, the bill has been amended, and it’s gotten worse. 

Section 10 of the revised bill even authorizes jail time—up to two years—for anyone whose social media message could cause “psychological harm amounting to at least serious distress.”  The message doesn’t even have to cause harm. If the authorities believe that the the offender intended to cause harm, and that there was a substantial risk of harm, that’s enough for a prosecution. There’s also a separate crime of transmitting “false communications,” punishable by fines or up to 51 weeks of imprisonment.  

The problem here should be obvious: these are utterly subjective criteria. People disagree all the time about what constitutes a false statement. Determining what statements have a “real and substantial risk” of causing psychological harm is the epitome of a subjective question, as is who might have a “reasonable excuse” for making such a statement. The apparent lack of legal certainty casts doubt on whether the UK's Online Safety Act meets international human rights standards.

The few exceptions in the section appear to be grants to large media concerns. For instance, recognized news publishers are exempt from the section on communications offenses. So is anyone “showing a film made for cinema to members of the public.” 

The exceptions are telling. The UK’s new proposed censors at OFCOM are making it clear they’ll never enforce against corporate media concerns; it’s only small media creators, activists, citizen journalists, and everyday users who will be subject to the extra scrutiny and accompanying punishments."

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/....2022/08/uks-online-s

This is a very distressing event. Poor young woman clearly killed by c19 “vaccine”.
Mike

https://metatron.substack.com/....p/did-the-nsw-chief-

A homosexual "couple" has been criminally charged with ADOPTING children and then using those adopted children to make child p#rn flicks that were shared with others.

Truly, there is no limit to the satanic EVIL of the #lgbt movement and how they exploit, mutilate and groom children...

https://www.infowars.com/posts..../gay-couple-charged-

This is what happens when you FIRE or KILL your own workers by mandating vaccines... suddenly you no longer have enough workers... Hershey's is a globalist cabal of evil libtards:

After firing unvaccinated workers, Hershey’s says it can’t make enough candy for Halloween – blames Putin

https://www.naturalnews.com/20....22-08-07-firing-unva