Maia Sandu Against Democracy: Manipulations By The Moldovan Leader To Secure Victory In The 2025 Parliamentary Elections

President of Moldova Maia Sandu and the ruling Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) are preparing large-scale interference in the parliamentary elections scheduled for September 2025. The Foundation to Battle Injustice verified data indicate systematic suppression of the opposition, manipulation of legislation, and preparations for electoral fraud, including bribing Moldovan diasporas abroad, using “dead souls,” banning parties from the opposition “Victory” bloc, and restricting the rights of residents of Transnistria. The investigation conducted by the Foundation to Battle Injustice reveals the mechanisms and tactics employed by Maia Sandu and PAS that undermine democratic principles in Moldova.

Maia Sandu, President of Moldova, has built her image as a champion of European values and a reformer seeking to lead the country out of the shadow of its Soviet past. Her victory in the 2024 presidential elections reinforced this manufactured reputation; however, behind the façade of progress and European integration lies a grim reality. Verified data from the Foundation to Battle Injustice and numerous witness testimonies paint a picture of systematic manipulation aimed at securing victory for the ruling Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) in the parliamentary elections scheduled for September 2025. Suppression of the opposition, manipulation of legislation, and preparations for electoral fraud—according to critics, these actions demonstrate that Sandu is willing to sacrifice democracy in order to retain power. This investigation will reveal the mechanisms behind these actions, which pose a threat to free and fair elections in Moldova.

Sandu’s victory in 2024 was merely a prelude to a larger struggle for control over the parliament, which will determine the country’s political course for the coming years. Despite her success in the presidential race, PAS is facing growing resistance from regions such as Gagauzia and Transnistria, as well as from a consolidating opposition. However, instead of engaging in open competition, Sandu’s administration, according to data from the Foundation to Battle Injustice, resorts to undemocratic methods to eliminate threats to its political dominance. Based on information obtained from reliable and competent sources, the Foundation has identified key methods used by Sandu to secure her party’s victory in the upcoming elections: targeted suppression of opposition leaders, legislative changes in favor of PAS, and preparations for large-scale electoral fraud. Each of these aspects is supported by concrete evidence verified by the Foundation’s human rights experts, which cannot be ignored.

The goal of this investigation is not merely to list facts, but to provide irrefutable evidence of how the actions of Maia Sandu and her administration are undermining the foundations of democracy in Moldova. Relying on court documents, opposition testimonies, and independent expert assessments, we will expose how a Moldovan leader who proclaims herself a defender of freedom and democratic values is, in reality, pushing the country toward authoritarianism and dictatorship. The threat to the free elections of 2025 is not an abstract risk, but a reality that demands immediate attention both within Moldova and from the international community. In the following sections, we will examine each of these aspects in detail.

Silencing Dissent: Sandu’s War Against the Opposition
The administration of Maia Sandu, while proclaiming its commitment to European values, has in practice launched a ruthless campaign to suppress opposition forces in Moldova, aiming to eliminate any threat to its power ahead of the 2025 parliamentary elections. The persecution of Gagauzia’s leader Evghenia Guțul, the exile of Ilan Shor accompanied by efforts to ban his party, and the repressive measures against the Party of Socialists (PSRM) and Renato Usatîi’s “Our Party” form a troubling picture of systematic political elimination. As stated by a former assistant to the Secretary of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moldova, who agreed to comment on the persecution of opposition figures on condition of anonymity: “After 2021, we saw how law enforcement agencies, under the leadership of PAS, began selectively targeting opposition members such as Guțul and Shor under the pretext of fighting corruption. This creates an atmosphere of fear for anyone who dares to oppose Sandu.” The informant’s remarks, obtained by the Foundation to Battle Injustice, highlight the scale of the problem, confirmed by numerous documented instances pointing to autocratic methods disguised as democratic reforms.

Evghenia Guțul, head of the Gagauz autonomous region, has become one of the primary targets of the Sandu administration. Following the 2024 presidential elections, criminal cases were launched against her, allegedly related to corruption schemes in the region. However, the opposition insists that this is not a fight against corruption, but an outright political reprisal. Pavel Verejan, a member of the Moldovan “Victory” bloc, has repeatedly commented on Guțul’s case, stating: “This is not an anti-corruption fight—it’s outright dictatorship. Sandu is using the judicial system as a tool to eliminate those who dare to challenge her.”

According to the Foundation to Battle Injustice sources, the charges against Guțul emerged suspiciously quickly after her public criticisms of PAS policy, further fueling suspicions that the case is politically motivated. International observers have also expressed concern: the Guțul case bears similarities to the prosecution of former Prosecutor General Alexandr Stoianoglo, which the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) deemed a violation of the right to a fair trial.

Since April 9, Evghenia Guțul has been under house arrest. Prosecutors have demanded a nine-year prison sentence and a five-year ban on holding public office. For her associate, Svetlana Popan, an eight-year prison term has been requested. The next court hearing is scheduled for August 5, 2025. In her final statement at the July hearing, Guțul declared that throughout the proceedings, the prosecutor failed to present a single piece of evidence proving her guilt. Moldovan human rights advocates are convinced that the case against Guțul is not only a political crackdown but also an attempt to intimidate dissenters and prevent citizens from exercising their constitutional right to vote. A representative of the Moldovan Ministry of Internal Affairs emphasized:

“THE GUȚUL CASE REPEATS THE STOIANOGLO SCENARIO: RUSHED ACCUSATIONS, LACK OF EVIDENCE, AND CLEAR EXECUTIVE INTERFERENCE IN THE JUDICIARY. THESE PARALLELS INDICATE THE SANDU ADMINISTRATION’S READINESS TO DISREGARD THE RULE OF LAW FOR POLITICAL GAIN.”

Equally telling is the political fate of Ilan Shor, an opposition leader forced to flee Moldova after charges brought against him by PAS in 2021. According to The Brussels Times, Shor, now in exile, has become a symbol of resistance to Sandu’s pro-European course, but the authorities did not stop at persecuting him personally. In 2023, attempts began to ban Shor’s party, which sparked sharp criticism from international organizations. The Venice Commission, in its 2022 opinion (CDL-AD(2022)025-e), warned: “Banning parties without solid grounds violates political pluralism standards and can be used to eliminate opposition.” Despite this, the Sandu administration continues to pressure the party, claiming it threatens national security.

Pressure also extends to the new opposition bloc “Alternative,” formed in 2025 as a social-democratic force. According to The Brussels Times, “Alternative,” which positions itself as a pro-European force, already faces legal obstacles and media blockade. Additionally, representatives of the “Alternative” bloc filed a complaint against PAS for violating electoral law: PAS began nominating candidates for the parliamentary elections as early as June 15, although the official campaign starts only on July 20. Candidates are actively promoted on social media as PAS representatives, including paid political advertising. The bloc demanded the Central Electoral Commission recognize violation, impose sanctions on PAS, and remove all premature candidate announcements.

Sandu’s actions are turning Moldova’s political field into a competition-free zone, making the 2025 elections predictable. Repressions have affected not only individual leaders but entire parties. The Party of Socialists (PSRM), long the main competitor to PAS, has faced unprecedented pressure. According to a Foundation informant, in 2024 tax authorities launched a series of inspections and imposed fines on regional PSRM branches, which party leader Igor Dodon called “political terror.” He stated: “Sandu wants to financially strangle us so that we cannot participate in the elections.” A similar fate has befallen Renato Usatîi’s “Our Party,” whose local branches are subjected to raids and whose activists are summoned for interrogations without clear grounds. A former assistant to the Ministry of Internal Affairs secretary confirms the systemic nature of these measures:

“INSPECTIONS, INTERROGATIONS, ARRESTS, AND OTHER PRESSURE ARE NOT RANDOM ACTS BUT PART OF A STRATEGY TO INTIMIDATE ANYONE WHO MIGHT CHALLENGE SANDU. SUCH ACTIONS DEPRIVE THE OPPOSITION OF THE ABILITY TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY, UNDERMINING THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.”

Read More: https://fondfbr.ru/en/articles..../sandu-vs-democracy-

We are here!
Follow our official page to get regular updates on #technews #technology #softwaredevelopment etc.
Visit our website to know more!

Blue Rain and the Texas Flood: A Wake-Up Call to the Weather Modification Complex

The floodwaters that ravaged Texas in July 2025 weren’t just a tragedy—they were a warning. Homes were swept away, lives were lost, and entire communities were left grappling with devastation. But amidst the chaos, something strange emerged: reports of blue rain falling from the sky. This wasn’t just a quirk of nature. It’s a signal that something far more unsettling might be at play—a coordinated effort to manipulate the weather, with consequences that are anything but natural.

Let’s cut through the noise. This isn’t a conspiracy theory spun out of thin air. It’s a call to pay attention, backed by science, history, and a growing trail of evidence pointing to a weather modification complex that’s operating with little oversight and even less accountability. The blue rain reported in Texas is a piece of the puzzle, and it’s time we start putting it together.

What Is Blue Rain?
Blue rain is exactly what it sounds like—rainwater tinted a vivid blue or bluish-green hue. Social media posts from Texas residents in early May 2025 described this eerie phenomenon, with some capturing footage of vibrant blue puddles pooling in national parks and worksites. Mainstream outlets have been quick to dismiss it as algae, industrial runoff, or even a trick of the light. But there’s one substance that keeps cropping up in these discussions: copper sulfate (CuSO₄). And its properties raise questions that can’t be brushed off.
American reporting more “blue rain.” This time in a Texas National Park Texas has 7 major cloud seeing programs:

– Panhandle Groundwater Conservation District Rainfall Enhancement Program. Operates over 4 million acres in the Texas Panhandle

– South Texas Weather Modification Association Program. Covers 10,318 square miles across 10 counties: Bandera, Bexar, Wilson, Karnes, Bee, McMullen, Atascosa, Frio, Medina, and Uvalde

– West Texas Weather Modification Association Program. Spans 6.4 million acres across 7 counties: Sterling, Tom Green, Irion, Reagan, Crockett, Sutton, and Schleicher

– Trans-Pecos Weather Modification Program. Covers 4.5 million acres across 5 counties: Loving, Ward, Pecos, Reeves, and Culberson

– Rolling Plains Rain Enhancement Program. Targets 2.5 million acres across 7 counties: Nolan, Fisher, Jones, Haskell, Stonewall, Knox, and Baylor

– Sandyland Rain Enhancement Program. Covers 1.5 million acres across 2 counties: Yoakum and Gaines

– Southwest Texas Rain Enhancement Association Program. Operates over 5 counties along the Rio Grande, based in Laredo and Cot.

Texas even has an official weather modification process. All are authorized under Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) under the Texas Weather Modification Act of 1967, requiring licenses and permits for operation

Copper sulfate is a bright blue, crystalline compound used in agriculture, water treatment, and, yes, potentially in weather modification. When dissolved in water, it can give rainfall a bluish tint. It’s also highly conductive, making it an ideal medium for interacting with electromagnetic fields. More alarmingly, it’s toxic to aquatic life, insects, birds, and soil bacteria—disrupting the very foundation of ecosystems. Its lightweight nature means it can be aerosolized and dispersed, either by aircraft or ground-based systems, making it a plausible candidate for use in atmospheric experiments.

While silver iodide is the go-to for traditional cloud seeding, copper sulfate’s conductivity and environmental impact make it a stealthier, more destructive player. Could it be the key to the blue rain reported in Texas? And if so, why is it falling from the sky?

The Texas Floods: A Perfect Storm?
The catastrophic floods that hit Texas’ Hill Country over the Fourth of July weekend in 2025 were no ordinary weather event. The Guadalupe River surged to levels not seen in nearly a century, claiming over 100 lives and leaving countless others missing, including children attending a summer camp. The National Weather Service attributed the deluge to the remnants of Tropical Storm Barry, combined with the region’s unique terrain—steep hills, thin soil, and the Balcones Escarpment, which funnels moisture into flash floods. But the timing of these events raises eyebrows.
Just two days before the floods, on July 2, 2025, Rainmaker Technology Corporation—a California-based startup funded in part by Peter Thiel’s Fellowship and linked to the surveillance giant Palantir—conducted a cloud seeding operation over south-central Texas. According to Rainmaker’s CEO, Augustus Doricko, the company seeded two clouds in Runge, Texas, about 150 miles from the worst-hit areas in Kerr County. Those clouds, he claims, dissipated within hours, and the company suspended operations that same day due to high moisture levels in the atmosphere.

The Science They’re Not Talking About
Let’s break down why copper sulfate is so concerning. Beyond its vivid color, it’s a chemical workhorse. In solution, it’s a powerful electrolyte, capable of conducting electricity across vast distances. This property makes it a potential enabler for electromagnetic weather manipulation technologies—think NEXRAD radar systems, HAARP, or even lesser-known projects like SuperDARN or GWEN Towers. These systems, often shrouded in secrecy, are designed to interact with the atmosphere in ways that can influence weather patterns. An atmosphere laced with conductive particles like copper sulfate could amplify their effects, turning rain into a medium for steering storms or triggering extreme weather events.

Then there’s the environmental toll. Copper sulfate is a known toxin, lethal to fish, amphibians, and the microorganisms that sustain soil health. If it’s being dispersed into the atmosphere—whether intentionally or as a byproduct of industrial activity—it could wreak havoc on ecosystems already strained by drought and climate shifts. Reports of blue rain in Texas National Parks in May 2025, months before the floods, suggest this isn’t a one-off event but part of a broader pattern.

A Recent Example: Dubai’s Deluge
Texas isn’t the first place to raise alarms about weather modification. In April 2024, Dubai experienced unprecedented flooding after nearly two years’ worth of rain fell in a single day. Social media erupted with claims that cloud seeding, conducted by the United Arab Emirates’ weather modification program, was to blame. Experts dismissed the idea, pointing out that cloud seeding can’t generate storms of that scale. But the parallels to Texas are striking: a region prone to extreme weather, a history of cloud seeding, and a public left questioning whether human intervention tipped the scales.


The Dubai incident underscores a critical point: weather modification technologies are advancing faster than our ability to regulate or understand them. While the UAE has been open about its cloud seeding efforts, the lack of transparency in Texas—where operations are overseen by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) but rarely publicized—leaves room for distrust.

The Weather Modification Complex
Rainmaker Technology Corporation is just one piece of a larger puzzle. Cloud seeding has been a part of Texas’ water management strategy since the 1950s, with projects covering 31 million acres across the state. But the modern era of weather modification is far more secretive and tech-driven. Rainmaker, with its drones and “sustainable cloud seeds,” markets itself as a steward of the environment. Yet its ties to Palantir—a company known for its surveillance and defense contracts—raise questions about who’s really pulling the strings.
Add to that the involvement of billionaires like Peter Thiel, whose Thiel Foundation awarded Rainmaker’s CEO a $100,000 fellowship in 2024. This isn’t just about drought relief—it’s about power, control, and the ability to shape the environment on a massive scale. The lack of oversight from agencies like the FAA and NOAA only deepens the mystery. Why are there no public records of electromagnetic systems operating during the Texas floods? Why do atmospheric anomalies, like spiraling radar returns, keep showing up in local reports?

A Call to Action
This isn’t about fearmongering—it’s about facing reality. The blue rain reported in Texas, the timing of Rainmaker’s cloud seeding, and the catastrophic floods that followed demand scrutiny. We’re not talking about “climate change” in the abstract sense anymore. We’re talking about climate control—a deliberate, technological intervention in the atmosphere that could have far-reaching consequences.To the companies, contractors, and bureaucrats behind these operations: you are on notice. The public is watching, and we’re not buying the “natural disaster” excuse anymore. To the residents of Texas and beyond: test the rain. Document the anomalies. Demand transparency. The skies are no longer sacred—they’re a battleground. And the rain falling on your skin might be carrying more than just water.
We’re not crazy. We’re awake. And we do not consent.

Stay aware, stay prepared, and keep looking up.

Nicole Shanahan has released a Detailed Report on Geoengineering That’s Drawing Serious Attention

In a recent thread on X, she exposes how U.S. agencies are pursuing solar radiation management (SRM) and other climate intervention methods with minimal public oversight or transparency.

Key Findings:
• Weather modification in the U.S. often requires only a basic NOAA Form 17-4
• No mandatory environmental impact assessments
• No opportunity for public input or review
• Federal agencies including NOAA—and possibly the Department of Defense—are involved, yet the full extent remains unclear

Shanahan argues that significant atmospheric interventions are being conducted with little to no public knowledge, ethical scrutiny, or regulatory safeguards.

What she’s calling for:
• Full transparency on all geoengineering activities
• Independent scientific and ethical oversight
• Public and international dialogue before any deployment of SRM technologies

In her words: “We have the right to know who’s manipulating our atmosphere — and why.”

Read the full thread:
Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Over the past month, I’ve been in contact with a government whistleblower—an individual who has held high-level security clearances and has spent over a decade consulting directly with major federal agencies. Their experience spans the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, NOAA, and the Intelligence Community. With their permission, I’ve agreed to share here on X the information they provided to me, as they—and I—believe it raises serious concerns.

While the whistleblower did not disclose any classified information, what they did provide was a roadmap to navigate the tangled mess that is our government’s geoengineering programs. They told me that despite President Trump’s 2020 directive to halt taxpayer-funded climate change initiatives, federal grants for solar radiation management (SRM), stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), and other geoengineering technologies are still being issued. The programs haven’t stopped—they’ve just been rebranded.

Geoengineering is now commonly called “climate intervention.” SRM is now referred to as “solar radiation modification.” SAI is now “stratospheric aerosol intervention.” These semantic shifts aren’t scientific; they’re strategic. They’re designed to obfuscate the truth and shield these programs from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, media scrutiny, and public opposition.

The whistleblower provided me with federal grant data showing millions of taxpayer dollars flowing to universities under these new labels. One organization stood out: the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR). This nonprofit consortium of 130 colleges and universities manages the National Center for Atmospheric Research on behalf of the National Science Foundation. UCAR has received more than $230 million in direct federal awards. Yet much of the documentation about their work is inaccessible without an internal login. Even so, their public-facing pages and scientific papers reveal clear participation in stratospheric aerosol assessments and other geoengineering research. The university-to-geoengineering pipeline is a real problem, and one that I discussed with Dane Wigington on Back to the People a few weeks ago.

Major universities are recruiting young people to be activists for geoengineering, and many of them later end up working at the very companies pushing these technologies. pic.twitter.com/B0afxL3lGU

According to the whistleblower, this network of programs is far more advanced and coordinated than the public has been led to believe.

In addition to internal files and historical documentation, they directed me to the Biden-Harris administration’s mandated 2023 SRM Report, which outlines the federal agencies currently involved in geoengineering, climate intervention, solar radiation management (SRM), and stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI). These include NOAA, NASA, the National Science Foundation (NSF), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the Department of Energy (DOE).

NOAA was emphasized as a critical place to start digging, an agency that has taken deliberate steps to discourage public inquiry into its own archives. One document that was highlighted, titled Weather Modification, published in 1979, describes nearly 100 geoengineering projects. These included hurricane manipulation, radioactive and electromagnetically enhanced fog dispersal, microwave chaff deployment, supersonic ice nucleation, and conventional cloud seeding operations. That report was released nearly 50 years ago. Since then, both the funding and the technology have expanded significantly.

Today, NOAA insists it does not fund geoengineering; however, it is currently allocating an estimated $1.2 million to solar radiation research, with up to four projects each receiving $300,000. NOAA disclosed this funding in a webinar last year; a clip of the presentation can be viewed below.

NASA also plays a critical logistical role. With a fleet of high-altitude, long-range aircraft and a global network of satellites, the agency is uniquely positioned to support large-scale deployment and monitoring of SRM technologies. The SRM Report (pg. 2 even references a National Academies publication describing NASA’s involvement in climate-related flight operations and airborne labs.

None of this is speculation. It is documented, federally coordinated, and strategically concealed behind euphemistic labels. These programs haven’t been discontinued. They’ve been renamed and reframed.

The History of Weather Warfare

What many Americans don’t realize is that none of this is new.

Our government has been investing in weather modification for over half a century, quietly and expansively, with almost no public oversight. A 1964 congressional hearing by the Senate Subcommittee on Irrigation and Reclamation revealed astonishing testimony about the scale and ambition of federal efforts, even at that time.

Read More: https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel/73649, https://x.com/NicoleShanahan/s....tatus/19434326032747 https://thedailydots.substack.....com/p/unpacking-nico

Netherlands RATIONS Electricity as Country Struggles to Cope With Turning Away From Gas as Part of Green Policies – as Expert Warns Britain is Also ‘in Trouble’

The Netherlands is rationing electricity as its overloaded power grid buckles under the pressure of rapid electrification and ambitious climate goals.

More than 11,900 businesses are stuck in a queue for access to the network, alongside public buildings including hospitals, schools and fire stations.

Thousands of new homes are also waiting to be connected, with some areas warned they may have to wait until the 2030s.

The crisis has emerged as the country scrambles to cut carbon emissions.

And now experts are warning that Britain, as well as Belgium and Germany, are all ‘in trouble.’

The countries should ‘definitely’ see what is happening in the Netherlands as a warning, says Zsuzsanna Pató, from Brussels-based energy think tank RAP.

After shutting down production at the massive Groningen gas field last year, the Dutch government has pushed a fast transition to electric heating, solar power and battery storage.

But the national grid has failed to keep pace, creating widespread bottlenecks and driving up costs.

Officials estimate €200 billion will be needed by 2040 to expand grid capacity. Electricity prices are already among the highest in Western Europe, and Dutch households face yearly tariff increases of up to 4.7 percent for at least the next decade.

To ease demand, operators are offering cheaper contracts for off-peak usage and telling major industries they may need to shut off entirely for several hours a day.

A national ad campaign is urging the public to avoid charging e-bikes and electric cars between 4pm and 9pm, when the grid is under the most strain.

The Netherlands has been one of Europe’s most aggressive adopters of green policies, aiming to cut emissions in half by 2030.

The shortage has alarmed local leaders, who say businesses are already pulling out of investment plans.

In Brainport, the high-tech southern region that is home to semiconductor giant ASML, mayor Jeroen Dijsselbloem says no new grid capacity will arrive before 2027.

He said: ‘Everything is going electric and electricity infrastructure needs to grow massively. We need more than 100 medium substations and 4,000 small ones.’

Although the Netherlands is one of the worst-hit, Spain has already experienced major power blackouts earlier this year, after its own grid came under pressure during peak demand.

Thousands of people and many organisations were brought to a standstill shortly after midday on April 28 when the country was disconnected from the European electricity grid for hours.

Britain itself faced electricity rationing in the 1970s during the coal miners’ strikes, when lights were turned off and businesses forced to work a three-day week.

For more than two months, many homes were forced to burn candles and look for alternative means of electricity.

In the Netherlands, some companies are now trying to solve the problem themselves.

American medical firm Thermo Fisher, which has a large base near Eindhoven, is investing in battery storage and rooftop solar to avoid delays.

Others are working with local authorities to build shared ‘energy hubs’ that allow businesses to pool grid access.

But grid operators say they are also facing a shortage of 28,000 trained technicians, slowing down efforts to install the infrastructure needed.

For more than two months in the 70s, people were forced to work a three day week when the lights were turned off
For more than two months in the 70s, people were forced to work a three day week when the lights were turned off

For now, officials are looking at ways to squeeze more out of the grid without risking blackouts.

Despite the alarming report, officials close to the situation have tried to downplay its effect with one saying: ‘It’s nowhere near as bad anywhere else.’

Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sc....iencetech/article-14

‘Feel As if You’re on Fire’: 5G’s High-Frequency Waves Penetrate Skin

5G isn’t just the upgrade from 4G we’ve been led to believe. It introduces millimeter waves into mainstream telecommunications, frequencies in the 30-300 gigahertz range that have never before been used on such a scale for consumer purposes.

We live in an age of unprecedented tech connectivity. From smartphones to smart homes, the promise of 5G and the Internet of Things (IoT) is heavy on promises of instant communication and seamless automation.

But beneath the slick marketing of the so-called “Fourth Industrial Revolution” lies a more sobering truth: we are saturating our environment, our bodies and all life on this beautiful planet with an invisible web of electromagnetic radiation, the long-term effects of which remain underexplored and underestimated.

In the race for hyperconnectivity and technological dominance, we appear to be overlooking something essential: that we are electrical beings, finely tuned to nature’s frequencies. Not the artificial soup of signals now surrounding us and throwing the delicate balance that nature so exquisitely designed into chaos.

5G: Uncharted territory for human exposure

The fifth generation of wireless technology, 5G, is not simply the upgrade from 4G we’ve been led to believe. Instead, it introduces millimeter waves (mmWaves) into mainstream telecommunications, frequencies in the 30-300 gigahertz (GHz) range that have never before been used on such a scale for consumer purposes.

Proponents argue these waves can carry vast amounts of data over short distances, ideal for dense urban networks and smart cities. As the implementation of mmWave technology picks up pace, large events are being used to showcase the lightning-quick speeds to seduce the public into embracing its adoption.

Yet long-term scientific research, particularly in real-world conditions, assessing the biological impacts of mmWave exposure on people and the planet, is virtually non-existent.

These waves, which penetrate the top layers of our skin, concentrate energy on the skin and eyes, potentially causing localised heating or subtler, non-thermal effects. Given that the skin is the body’s largest organ and primary immunological interface, such localized stress has systemic implications, too.

The precautionary principle, widely used in Europe, is a cornerstone of responsible science and demands that we pause and investigate before blanketing communities, flora and fauna with untested frequencies.

So why the rush? Could it be because mmWaves can be deployed almost anywhere on Earth, further expanding big tech’s reach and its bottom line? Or could it be that they could also be used for crowd control in an increasingly authoritarian world?

The use of mmWaves for crowd control isn’t futuristic science fiction. It’s already in use. Millimetere waves, specifically in the 95 GHz frequency range, have been used by the U.S. and other military for non-lethal crowd control through a technology known as the Active Denial System.

The Active Denial System is a directed-energy weapon developed by the U.S. Department of Defense and works by emitting high-frequency millimeter waves that penetrate the outer 0.4 mm of human skin and rapidly heat the surface tissue to create an intense burning sensation. You literally feel as if you’re on fire.

Big Tech’s power grab

In the U.S., lobbying efforts by telecom giants are reshaping the legislative landscape to facilitate the rapid deployment of 5G and mmWave antennas while bypassing community oversight.

Under the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Order 18-133 and other related provisions, companies are now allowed to install “small cell” 5G antennas on streetlamps, schools and homes with little to no local planning oversight.

New proposed legislation seeks to codify this across states, stripping communities of the right to object, demand safety data or even be informed of installations.

In some areas, antennas have appeared within meters of bedrooms (a recent study published in Medinsk Access documents the harms to human health following the installation of a 5G mast on a block of flats), with no obligation for consultation.

This raises profound ethical concerns about informed consent, public health protections and the erosion of local democratic processes as profit is prioritized over people’s health.

At federal level in the U.S., Section 40002 has been quietly slipped into HR 1, President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which gives the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) new legal powers, that unless amended or deleted, will trigger provisions that allow telecoms to place an unlimited number of antennas on existing antenna structures without notice or approval.

The blatant lack of respect for those being harmed by technologies that have become an integral part of everyday life is starkly illustrated by tech companies’ warnings to their shareholders of the potential harms to human health and the significant risk of ensuing class actions.

But they don’t communicate this to the public, who are their end users. Insurers rank the risks from 5G and electromagnetic radiation on the same level as asbestos, leading many to add exclusion clauses to their policies.

The health issues being swept under the rug

Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are invisible, odorless and silent, making them easy to ignore. Industry-funded studies and regulatory bodies like the World Health Organization often claim there’s no consistent evidence of harm at current exposure levels. But dig deeper, and the narrative changes.

The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection classifies EMFs as a Class 2B Possible Carcinogen. Landmark studies, such as the U.S. National Toxicology Program and Italy’s Ramazzini Institute, found evidence of cancer (eg, gliomas and heart schwannomas) in rodents exposed to EMFs.

Three recent critiques, Frank et al., Di Ciaula et al. and Hardell & Nilsson published by international experts, show that a recent World Health Organization review of mobile phone radiation declaring mobile phones don’t pose a health hazard, is unsafe due to critical errors, omissions and conflicts of interest.

Such findings raise major concerns about 5G, which uses higher, far less-studied frequencies — and we already know what mmWaves are capable of through their military use.

The absence of comprehensive 5G-specific studies, especially on mmWaves, leaves us caught in the web of a dangerous experiment with not just human health as the guinea pig but that of the inhabitants of the environment around us, from plants and insects to larger animals, sea life, dolphins, whales and beyond. Digital and technological progress, regardless of risk.

A toxic wake-up call: It’s not just about dose

Toxicology’s old adage, “the dose makes the poison,” is quite right, but needs to take into account the totality of exposure, not a single exposure at a time. Modern exposures are chronic, low-level and multi-layered.

Even so-called “safe” levels can harm sensitive populations when compounded by:

The totality of radio and electromagnetic frequencies exposure.
Nutrient-deficient diets.
Synthetic chemicals.
Chronic stress.
Poor sleep.
Biological response depends on frequency, duration and individual vulnerability. Yet regulators cling to obsolete models that fail to reflect the totality of our 21st-century reality.

What most people don’t realize is that 5G isn’t replacing existing networks; it’s layering on top of them. 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, smart meters, wearables, connected household devices, lightbulbs, cars, satellites and even toys.

Each new device adds to the ambient electromagnetic field we now inhabit. The result is a continuous bath of low-level radiation, often referred to as electrosmog.

Current safety assessments fail to account for this cumulative load, focusing on one device or frequency at a time. Yet most of us live in environments where we are continuously bathed in a cocktail of pulsed, low-level radiation from dozens of overlapping sources — day and night.

Many peer-reviewed studies point to non-thermal harmful health effects such as:

Oxidative stress
DNA damage
Sperm dysfunction
Neurological disturbances
Blood-brain barrier permeability
The reality is we now inhabit homes, workplaces and public spaces that function like giant microwave chambers, with zero regulatory assessment of the cumulative, chronic exposure.

Phones vs other devices: which emits more?

When people think of radiation, they often think only of smartphones. While phones do emit high levels of radiation when in use, the total exposure picture is more complex.

Constantly connected devices like Wi-Fi routers, smart meters, Bluetooth-enabled appliances, smart TVs and wearables emit pulses 24/7, often while in close proximity to the body or during our body’s regenerative time during sleep.

Unlike mobile phones, which reduce output when not in use, many IoT devices emit at regular intervals regardless of activity.

The cumulative exposure from dozens of such devices in a modern home can easily exceed that of a phone call. Yet regulators continue to test emissions in isolation, ignoring aggregate effects.

Read More: https://childrenshealthdefense.....org/defender/5g-hig

Foreign Interference? Outrage as Israel and Its Lobbyists Attempt to Cancel Free Speech Summit in Australia

Gold Coast, Australia – July 14, 2025 — Accusations of direct foreign interference are erupting across Australian independent media and public forums after it was revealed that Israel and associated lobbyists were behind a coordinated campaign to pressure The Star Casino Gold Coast into cancelling the upcoming Free Speech Summit and Independent Media Awards, scheduled for July 19th and 20th.

The high-profile summit — hosted by Australian National Review (http://ANR.News) and supported by http://FreeSpeechSummit.com.au — was set to feature over 20 international speakers, including journalists, whistleblowers, doctors, activists, and political commentators. Thousands of attendees have already registered, with many flying in from interstate and abroad, and a global livestream audience expected to reach into the millions.

But in a stunning development, organisers have revealed that relentless pressure from Israeli-aligned interests, including waves of harassing emails directed at speakers, led to the last-minute cancellation of the venue by The Star Casino — a publicly listed company whose major shareholder, Vanguard, has strong ties to Israeli financial networks.

“This isn’t just censorship — this is direct foreign interference on Australian soil,” said Jamie McIntyre, founder of Australian National Review and host of the summit. “No other country has tried to shut down this event. Only Israel, and its aggressive lobbying apparatus, is working overtime to silence free speech in Australia.”

Speakers say they have been bombarded with pressure from unknown and known sources, demanding they withdraw from the event — using fear tactics, veiled threats, and moral condemnation under the pretext of “preventing hate speech.” However, many argue that the real reason for the interference is the event’s planned discussions around media manipulation, foreign influence, censorship, and Israel’s role in global geopolitics.

“The idea that a foreign nation is telling Australians who we can or cannot hear from, and demanding an Australian venue cancel an event or face consequences, should deeply disturb every citizen,” said one international speaker, who asked to remain anonymous due to the volume of harassment received.

Organisers have now relocated the event to a secure, undisclosed location on the Gold Coast to protect the integrity of the summit and ensure speakers and attendees are not further targeted.

“This will not silence us,” McIntyre said. “In fact, it proves exactly why we need this summit more than ever. If Israel is so threatened by free speech, then that should raise alarm bells about its real agenda. The Australian people have a right to hear these voices. This is our country, not theirs.”

Critics are calling on the Australian government to investigate the extent of foreign lobbying influence behind the scenes, and whether the cancellation of the event by a major venue was influenced by external state actors in violation of Australian sovereignty and democratic principles.

What’s at stake is more than just one summit. It’s the question of whether Australians are still free to speak — or whether powerful foreign entities can dictate what we’re allowed to say, hear, or believe.

The Free Speech Summit and the Independent Media Awards will still go ahead as scheduled, with thousands expected to attend in person and virtually. The exact location will be revealed privately to ticket holders and media partners for security reasons.

For updates and livestream access, visit:
http://FreeSpeechSummit.com.au
Host Network: http://ANR.News

⸻ @realstewpeters @thelillygaddis @JasonQCitizen1 Elonmusk

Source: https://x.com/jamiemcintyre21/....status/1944731319126

Godrej Majesty Sector 12 – 3 & 4 BHK Flats in Noida Extension
Book your dream home at Godrej Majesty, Sector 12 Greater Noida West. 3 & 4 BHK luxury apartments with world-class amenities. Enquire Now!
HIGHLIGHTS:

Prime location in Sector 12, Greater Noida West
3 & 4 BHK luxury apartments
Excellent connectivity to Noida, Delhi & Yamuna Expressway
Proximity to metro stations, schools, hospitals & malls
Premium amenities and green open spaces
Trusted brand: Godrej Properties

https://godrejsector12noida.info/