From JIM STONE: BOOOOM!!! REMOTE HIJACK JET HAD SPY WHO HAD DIRT ON REPRESENTATIVE ERIC SWALWELL AND MANY MORE AMERICAN POLITICIANS ON BOARD.
Here ya go!! Confirmation my assumptions about the crash were BANG ON. Trolls are trying to bury this and say it was a different fang fang, but that's not probable when the one on the plane was the exact same age of the spy, a spy who went on to work in finance the same way she did for the politicians.
MY GUESS: Chinese cutie pie probably threatened the wrong people in the U.S. government now that people are waking up. HERE IS MORE:
I have modified the following report because as it was originally typed it obviously rattled too many cages. One of the ISP's we use banned this site right after I posted this. Don't worry, it is still plenty "good".
THE UNITED STATES MAY HAVE REMOTE HIJACKED A CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES BOEING 737 AND FLEW IT VERTICALLY INTO THE GROUND
UPDATE: THE PLANE WAS NOT A 737 MAX 8 THAT HAD PROBLEMS. IT WAS A MODEL THAT HAS BEEN AROUND SINCE 1994.
They (may have) used the same remote hijack system that was used with the 911 planes. The United States is the only country that has the Boeing codes and someone did this. The hijack was unexpectedly caught on a very clear CCTV system, the plane was going far in excess of the sound barrier, my guess is mach 1.7 which a Boeing jet will do in a dive if you don't intend to fly it.
Remote hijack capabilities were put in all boeing planes after 1983 to make it impossible for terrorists to hijack the planes. But that won't stop a corrupt government with a child molesting presidential family from using it during a war. CHINA, IT LOOKS LIKE THE UNITED STATES DID THIS. THERE IS YOUR WAR. Yes, this happened hours after China did not bow down to Washington, and Washington subsequently banned and blacklisted Chinese diplomats from travel. The plane had to have been perfectly intact with no problems to hold together at that speed. This is clear. View it full screen. The United States probably figured there would not be such clear video. This is going to screw the United States out of being able to claim it is a "boeing 737 problem" but they will probably try, even though it was not this model of 737 that had problems.
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Did I read anywhere that this was a remote hijack?? NO. But I am qualified to say it was. I knew about that system the entire time I was ____________ but stupidly believed it "made the world a better place". Without any hesitation whatsoever I will openly declare that was a remote hijack, they cannot blame the plane for that but they will probably try. Boeing is going to get on the line with china and pump China's ears full of bull****.
REALITY: Gaze upon the new face of high tech warfare, that is exactly what it looks like and it is possible with any Boeing plane introduced after 1983.
