This is an interesting if extended monologue from a lawyer about Pfizer’s most recent disclosure to the Stock Exchange Commission (SEC).
Though Pfizer has legal immunity v prosecution in the event it’s c19 “vaccine” harms people or doesn’t work (excepting fraud, which is notoriously difficult to prove), it has no such immunity if it misleads investors.
In order not to mislead investors, Pfizer must disclose material risks & uncertainties.
Surprisingly, in this latest SEC filing, they say “while our vaccine is currently subject to an emergency use authorization, our financial targets might suffer if we cannot demonstrate evidence of sufficient efficacy or safety to obtain formal, permanent regulatory approval”.
I’ve read a lot of SEC filings. They tend to be exhaustive. It’s always a risk that a product won’t gain an approval.
But this specific worry bead is surprising to anyone who doesn’t already know that is all data fraud.
Surely that ought to be a slam dunk after 15+ months of continuous use?
Best wishes
Mike



Channel: @RobinMG

When staying true to your values and instincts was the right thing to do.
Smiles.
I am now one of the privileged that is allowed to travel where I want and when I want without 'conditions' and I can return to my livelihood, without 'conditions'.
Laughs.
I have stayed sovereign and never needed Ministers and Politicians forcing, pressuring, lying, threatening me about my own health and what 'they' think is best for me . Stick your experimental procedures where they fit.
Smiles.
You never got me.
Sweet Victory.

PS. Going back the Ex - industry who ditched me, who betrayed me who treated me like ****, isn't going to happen. Handing in the teachers registration.

Almost there.

Sure has made the most of this act!

Virtue signaling geniuses.