לְגַלוֹת פוסטיםחקור תוכן שובה לב ונקודות מבט מגוונות בדף Discover שלנו. חשוף רעיונות טריים והשתתף בשיחות משמעותיות
Hundreds of Coast Guard members sue Biden regime over covid vaccine mandates
More than 130 members of the United States Coast Guard are suing the Biden regime for trying to force them to get “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) against their religious beliefs.
Filed on July 25 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, the suit alleges that the federal government’s jab mandate is unconstitutional.
According to Dale Saran, one of the attorneys representing the service members, the final tally of plaintiffs is likely to exceed 200. The defendants include Alejandro Mayorkas, secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS); Linda L. Fagan, commandant of the Coast Guard; Lloyd Austin, secretary of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD); and Dr. Janet Woodcock, acting commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
All of the plaintiffs are either active-duty or reserve members of the Coast Guard, and all of them “have sincerely held religious beliefs that prohibit them from receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.”
Reports indicate that the plaintiffs filed for a religious exemption from the mandate, which is their right, only to have the Coast Guard deny it. The Aug. 24, 2021 jab mandate from the DOD clearly states that there are to be “medical, administrative, and Religious Accommodation Requests (RARs) to the mandate.”
Two days after the mandate was issued, the Coast Guard joined it, “incorporating the provisions of the DOD mandate.”
“In practice, only servicemembers with medical or administrative reasons for an exemption from the mandate are accommodated, and even those sparingly, while RARs are universally denied unless the requester is eligible for administrative separation – i.e., imminently leaving the Service,” the suit explains.
This “conclusively demonstrates that the Armed Services have systematically and willfully violated service members’ free exercise rights under RFRA Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the First Amendment.”
Coast Guard used “formulaic language” to deny exemptions with “nearly identical form letters”
The DOD mandate states that any service member who does not take the Fauci Flu shots will be involuntarily separated, which is what the plaintiffs currently face. They are also being discriminated against based on their vaccination status, which is unlawful.
“Because of their vaccination status, Plaintiffs have been harassed, treated differently than their peers, singled out publicly by their leaders, had their normal leave and liberty restricted, been removed from senior / leadership positions, been denied promotion, received official discipline, been barred from training, travel, new assignments and permanent change of station (‘PCS’) orders, and face imminent involuntary separation, all while they have continued to perform the mission alongside their ‘vaccinated’ peers, in many cases, while their ‘vaccinated’ peers got sick with COVID-19 in large numbers,” the suit adds.
The plaintiffs also say that each of them received an identical letter of rejection from the Coast Guard using “formulaic language.” It appears as though nobody even read the exemption requests and instead just sent off patent form letters to every service member who filed one.
Additionally, none of the original 122 plaintiffs who filed for an exemption received a response within the required 30-day deadline.
More than 90 percent of the plaintiffs have natural immunity anyway – not that this should be a requirement to maintain bodily autonomy, just to be clear. This is just another point made in the lawsuit as to the illegitimacy of the DOD mandate for the Coast Guard.
The lawsuit also makes clear that the mRNA (messenger RNA) injections from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are not, in fact, vaccines, but rather “gene-therapy treatments that meet none of the statutory and historical definitions to be considered ‘vaccines.'”
Follow and Share??@thegatewaypundit_news
?????? Read the beginning of the article ??????
Will life insurance companies get a settlement from the vaccine makers, as the cycle of depopulation is swept under the rug?
At Lincoln National, actuaries reported a 163 percent increase in death benefits paid out in 2021, after the vaccine was rolled out to the public. The large insurer paid out $500 million in 2019, $548 million in 2020, and a whopping $1.4 billion in 2021.
The global pandemic didn’t cause a drastic change in death benefits paid out, but for some reason, excess mortality was highest in 2021, when the COVID vaccine promised a way out. The year of the vaccine brought a tsunami of excess mortality, spiking the death rate to levels unthinkable for insurance companies to handle. Lincoln Financial is not poised to sue the vaccine manufacturers, however. Instead, they are justifying the surge in death payouts, pointing to “less favorable returns within the company’s alternative investment portfolio” that year. Lincoln Financial spokesperson Kelly DeAngelis said the company acquired Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston in 2021 and took on a slew of new claims. Even this acquisition does not explain the abnormal surge in death benefits paid out in 2021.
Perhaps the insurance companies will ultimately seek some kind of settlement from the vaccine manufacturers – to brush the depopulation issue under the rug.
Join and share ?@NaturalNewsMedia
Life insurance claims skyrocket after COVID jab rollout, prompting insurers to take legal action against vaccine manufacturers
Life insurance claims have skyrocketed since the COVID jab rollout, dwarfing the number of claims made during 2020 when a high-mortality-rate-pandemic was supposedly ravaging the Nation. Yale epidemiologist Harvey Risch believes that insurance companies are on the verge of taking legal action against vaccine manufacturers over vaccine-associated death risks that were downplayed from the very beginning.
Risch points to an explosion of “early unexpected mortality claims” after the COVID vaccine rollout. This influx of life insurance claims is not even COVID-related, and insurers are struggling to pay out. Risch says that vaccine manufacturers misrepresented the “all-cause mortality” from their very own clinical trials, not only deceiving the population into taking dangerous vaccines, but also misleading the insurance companies who are now forced to pay for thousands of needless deaths in young and middle-aged adults.
Will insurance companies seek financial compensation from the COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers to cover for “major financial risks that they have to figure out how to manage” going forward?
Epidemiologist believes life insurance companies may sue vaccine manufacturers for misleading statements
Risch has analyzed statements made by the CEOs of various group life insurance companies. He claims that the actuaries miscalculated, estimating that the vaccinated would “live longer than they have.” Risch said the actuaries were deceived on “all-cause mortality…from the original vaccine trials.”
In December of 2021, OneAmerica CEO Scott Davison attended a healthcare conference and spoke up about an “unheard of” 40 percent spike in the death rate of working-age people insured by the company. The 40 percent increase in death made no rational sense because the covid-19 vaccine had been rolled out the entire year. Government and public health officials promised that this vaccine program would save lives and end the pandemic.
Davison said that a 10 percent increase in death would have required a “one-in-200-year-catastrophe.” There was no way the company could have predicted a 10 percent increase in death claims, let alone a 40 percent increase, when the worst of the pandemic was supposed to be in the rear-view mirror. The vaccines were safe and effective, they were told, and no one was allowed to question the god-like status of these experimental jabs.
Most shocking, Davison said that the majority of insurance claims filed ARE NOT COVID-related deaths. In 2020, almost any medical issue could be coded as COVID-19, no matter how faulty the testing was, no matter how many underlying health issues and medical errors were to blame for the deaths. For the death rate to spike 40 percent and NOT be related to COVID-19 is an anomaly of mass proportions.
@NaturalNewsMedia
?????? Read more ??????
COPIED FROM COPS FOR TRUTH :
There is no doubt, that the last couple of years has been very educational and quite eye opening.
An awakening.
There are some very sinister people in our world, who are in positions of considerable power and authority.
The saddest part for me, has been an apparent unwillingness by professional investigators (police) to look at the other side of the narrative and bigger picture.
There is no reason to conduct experiments like this unless your intentions are bad.
Come on Police, snap out of it and do your job! ❤️??
.
The Danger of DNA Testing
"Derrick Broze breaks down his latest article regarding statements made by US politicians about the danger of DNA testing and the creation of gene-specific bioweapons."
https://theconsciousresistance.com/dna-bioweapon/
https://t.me/theconsciousresistance/1473
⬜️ https://t.me/Digital_ID_Au
stand with #dutchfarmers ????
.
https://gettr.com/streaming/p1l8lczb559
Best way to spend an evening - watching or listening to the replay .... it starts at about 19 : [Forwarded from Corona Investigative Committee ??/??/??]
[ Photo ]
Session 116: "See All Its Working Power"
August 5 from approx. (timezone calculator (https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/)):
70 a.m. CDT
10 p.m. BST
100 p.m. AEST
Here you can go directly to the stream at:
➥ Odysee ??
(https://odysee.com/@Corona-Inv....estigative-Committee Gettr ??
(https://gettr.com/streaming/p1l8lczb559)➥ Dlive ??
(https://dlive.tv/CoronaInvestigative)➥ Here you can find the link to the German stream ??
(https://t.me/Corona_Ausschuss/836)Topic excerpt:
▫️Daily absurdities as deliberate anesthesia, hypnosis and distraction from the essentials
▫️Ways of prevention and self-healing. Example: Initiating ketolysis through targeted nutrition.
▫️Further details on the theory, the injections included graphene.
▫️Gendeletion as a cause of various modern medical conditions and a functional feature of mRNA injections?
▫️Update on Prof. Martin Schwab's template letters
▫️Census: What is it for, what about data protection, and is there a danger that the data collected will be used to compensate for vaccination damage by means of a levy?
... and more!
Stay up to date:
@CoronaInvestigativeCommittee