Downing Street: More than 90% of all COVID deaths in England since start of 2022 were among the vaccinated

The British government recently issued a report revealing that more than 90 percent of patients who died of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) were injected with at least one dose.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) report spanned the period between Jan. 1 and May 31. It broke down the number of COVID-19 deaths during the five-month period in England, classifying them by vaccination status.

According to the ONS report, the month of February saw a total of 2,711 individuals die of COVID-19. Of this total, 2,447 individuals (90 percent) received at least one dose of the vaccine. Meanwhile, only 264 individuals (10 percent) of COVID-19 deaths that month were unvaccinated.

For the month of March, England saw a total of 2,860 COVID-19 fatalities. Of this total, 2,658 individuals (93 percent) were vaccinated while only 202 individuals – a measly seven percent – were unvaccinated.

A total of 3,571 COVID-19 deaths were recorded in April, with 3,365 (94 percent) of them being vaccinated. In contrast, only 206 unvaccinated individuals – six percent – died in England during that month.

Lastly, the ONS report stated that England recorded 1,364 COVID-19 deaths for May. Following a trend from the previous months, vaccinated individuals again comprised a majority of fatalities with 1,282 having been injected with at least one dose. Only 82 unvaccinated individuals died of COVID-19 that month, the lowest in the period.

A general trend observed during the ONS report’s five-month period was that deaths among the vaccinated population started increasing from February until May. In contrast, deaths among the unvaccinated were on a downward trend – aside from a slight uptick in April.

Ultimately, 91 percent of COVID-19 deaths are vaccinated individuals based on a five-month average of all the fatalities. (Related: Government data shows fully vaxxed account for more than 90% of COVID DEATHS in the UK.)

Huge percentage of COVID-19 deaths in England among the boosted
Many people may attribute the higher death counts to individuals who received only one or two COVID-19 vaccine doses. According to the U.K. Health Security Agency, almost half of England’s population turned down the third booster dose. Unfortunately, this is not the case – as the ONS report already included those who received the third and fourth booster doses.

From Jan. 1, 2022 until May 31, 2022, there were 15,113 COVID-19 deaths recorded. An astonishing 13,666 individuals (90.4 percent) part of this total received at least one dose of the vaccine. Of the 13,666 vaccinated individuals who died of COVID-19, 12,442 were among the boosted population – those who are triple- or quadruple-vaccinated.

It appears that those who turned down the boosters made a prudent decision, as only 1,224 single- or double-vaccinated individuals died within that five-month period.

Despite the concerning findings revealed by the ONS report, Britons are being primed to fear COVID-19 with the purported increase of deaths and to anticipate COVID-19 restrictions such as face masks and mandatory booster shots.

True enough, experts in the U.K. have been calling for another booster dose to be given by fall.

This led the Daily Expose to quip: “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome. Judging by the latest calls for a fifth vaccine dose, it looks like ‘experts’ in the UK really have lost their marbles.”

https://www.brighteon.com/85a6....0683-bb11-43d3-885d-

Join and share ?@NaturalNewsMedia

TWISTED: Fauci is now claiming that he never recommended lockdowns

Dr. Anthony Fauci recently claimed in an interview that he never recommended that the government institute a lockdown at the beginning of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020.

Fauci made this claim during an interview on the program “Rising” on The Hill TV. He claimed that it was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that made recommendations to institute lockdowns.

“First of all, I didn’t recommend locking anything down,” he claimed in his interview with The Hill journalist Batya Ungar-Sargon. “You’re asking me questions, you’re talking about the CDC, which is the public health agency that uses their epidemiologists and their science-based approach to make recommendations.”

He further claimed that he had always known that the lockdowns had negative effects on people, especially children who are affected by school closures.

“Clearly, whenever you close schools, there are collateral effects that are negative. I have always been well aware of that and I have always felt – and go back and look at my statements – that we need to do everything we can to keep the schools open and safe,” he said.

Fauci explained that “safe” meant forcing children to wear masks and get vaccinated and surrounding them with teachers and other school employees who are also vaccinated.

“Again, I have been on the record of saying that. Always try, to the best of your ability, to keep the children in school, but in a safe environment,” he added. “Locally, a decision is often made when there is so much infection to close the school, but I would always see that as a last resort, and I have always felt that way.”

Fauci’s previous statements contradict his claims

Fauci’s claim is easily contradicted by his statements from the past two years. For example, on March 12, 2020, Fauci spoke outside the White House about closing down schools as a form of disease mitigation.

“The one thing I do advise, and I said this in multiple hearings and multiple briefings, that right now we have to start implementing both containment and mitigation. And what was done when you close the school is mitigation.”

The next month, Fauci attacked Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis for considering reopening schools, and then two days later gave “his blessing” to former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s plan to extend the closure of schools.

In June 2020, he then approved of states shutting down almost all activity within their borders. “Any state that is having a serious problem, that state should seriously look at shutting down,” said Fauci.

And then, in Oct. 2020, Fauci told then-President Donald Trump to shut down the entire country.

“When it became clear that we had community spread in the country, with a few cases of community spread … I recommended to the president that we shut the country down,” he said. “Unfortunately, since we did not shut down completely the way China did … we actually did see spread even though we shut down.”

Fauci’s revisionism met with criticism

The response to Fauci’s claim that he never supported nor encouraged lockdowns has been met with near-universal criticism.

“Well, it’s absurd to suggest he didn’t,” said former Republican representative and chairman of the House Oversight Committee Jason Chaffetz. “I mean, he was clearly out there showing everybody – lock it down, put on your mask, don’t go to school, put restrictions on travel – all of those things.”

“He’s unashamed and unrepentant,” wrote Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky on his Twitter account. “But he knows the shutdowns were a catastrophic mistake, so he’s trying to rewrite history

“It’s clear that the people who were in charge of our nation’s COVID response are trying to rewrite history regarding the pandemic,” wrote Matt Margolis for PJ Media.

https://www.brighteon.com/8f16....5626-18ac-4c8f-8a73-

Join and share ?@NaturalNewsMedia

Russia will never abandon the love of homeland, faith and traditional values. In the West, they have apparently decided to cancel these millennial values. May 9. 2022. President Putin.

​​Propagandists now try to position COVID vaccine “Novavax” as HERBAL medicine after realizing public has lost all faith in deceptive pharmaceutical industry

Oh, the lengths the vaccine industrial complex will go to “sell” Americans on getting injected with experimental, toxic prions for the ultimate scamdemic, the Wuhan Flu. As of late, Novavax has created a fourth Fauci-Flu jab that incorporates tree bark and moth cells, clearly trying to make the vaccine sound “natural” which is stupid, because you don’t go around INJECTING tree sap into your blood.

This is just a sinister attempt at trying to make experimental COVID vaccines sound like they are herbal medicine. What a joke. Realizing nobody trusts Bill Gates/CCP death jabs anymore, and since people do trust NATURAL medicine, Novovax is trying to position their new virus stab as “herbal.” One major problem. In herbal medicine, we don’t INJECT herbs into our blood. Nice try pharma goons.

4th COVID-19 “vaccine” using spike proteins already authorized in US

A Big Pharma shill at the University of Nebraska Medical Center says “diversity in vaccine production” should convince people who are terrified of mRNA and other deadly allergens in COVID jabs to get injected with some new “proteins” from moths and trees that allegedly and magically prevent you from catching China Flu, or spreading it, or getting a bad case of it, or something like that.

Don’t be fooled. The Novavax “vaccine” does use coronavirus spike proteins (SARS-CoV-2 antigens) to influence the immune system to create antibodies. There is ZERO proof this protects against future COVID-19 infection, or any of its variants, for that matter.

The scientists basically put the SARS-CoV-2 genes into an insect virus, infecting the moth cells until it begins replicating them. Then they extract the spike proteins and claim this is the “traditional” way to get the “purified” spike proteins.

There’s nothing traditional or “herbal” about it though. Again, in herbal medicine, nobody is injecting herbs and tinctures into their veins. Ready for your moth ball and tree sap injection sir/ma’am? It’s very “safe and effective” don’t you know.

Soapbark tree extract used as adjuvant to increase immune response to spike proteins

Supposedly, humans can get injected with fewer spike proteins than the typical billion that are being used now in the protein payload injections from J&J, or from the relentless spike-protein-creating, DNA-reconfiguring mRNA jabs, and still create immunity against “gain of function” syndrome, a.k.a. the Fauci Flu. Dangerous adjuvants are used in nearly all vaccines to conjure up an unnatural, fight-or-flight style immune response, and this alone can cause severe, deadly side effects and adverse events.

Injecting soapbark tree extract from the Quillaja Saponaria (a.k.a. Matrix-M) allegedly “encourages immune cells to activate” thus conjuring up a potent immune response. There’s nothing at all natural about injecting this extract, and the immune response cannot simply be calibrated or up-regulated in some scientifically-formulated fashion that’s “safe and effective,” as pharma and the CDC ALWAYS claim about all vaccines.

The fact of the matter is that COVID-19 vaccines have already killed 750,000 people in the USA, and that’s just what’s reported at VAERS. Imagine all the vaccine-induced deaths that were counted as deaths by COVID, or heart attack, or stroke, or blood clots, or “vaccidents” (traffic deaths caused by vaccines).

Join and share ?@NaturalNewsMedia

?????? Read the beginning of the article ??????

“Effectiveness of primary infection against severe, critical or fatal COVID-19 reinfection was 97.3 percent, irrespective of the variant of primary infection or reinfection, and with no evidence of waning. Similar results were found in sub-group analyses for those less than 50 years of age,” they wrote.

“Despite waning protection against reinfection, strikingly, there was no evidence for the waning of protection against severe COVID-19 at reinfection. This remained at around 100 percent, even 14 months after the primary infection, with no appreciable effect for omicron immune evasion in reducing it.”

Before the emergence of omicron in late November 2021, natural immunity against COVID-19 dropped to only 70 percent after 16 months – which the study authors attributed to a “genuine waning in biological immunity.”

While much more infectious than earlier strains, omicron caused milder symptoms in infected individuals. The BA4 and BA5 sub-variants of omicron are now the most dominant strain of SARS-CoV-2.

“Vaccine immunity may last for only a year, but natural immunity may last for three years,” the study authors stated.

https://www.brighteon.com/0542....43c9-ea40-4c2e-b675-

Join and share ?@NaturalNewsMedia

NEJM study: Vaccinated, boosted individuals remain contagious for a LONGER period of time than the unvaccinated

A group of doctors has found that unvaccinated people are less contagious 10 days after catching the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) than vaccinated and boosted people.

The doctors from hospitals across Massachusetts noted their findings in a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). The letter, originally published in late June, showed that individuals injected with the COVID-19 vaccine and subsequently catch the disease remain infectious for a longer duration.

The doctors examined 66 study participants who contracted COVID-19 between July 2021 and January 2022. Of this total, 32 were infected with the B16172 delta variant, while 34 were infected with the milder B11529 omicron variant. Only one participant manifested symptoms of COVID-19 infection, the letter stated.

Using both polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests and viral cultures, the researchers compiled several charts outlining how long infected people remained contagious with SARS-CoV-2. They separated their findings based on vaccination status – unvaccinated, vaccinated and boosted.

They found that 68.75 percent of unvaccinated people were no longer contagious after the first 10 days of infection, based on PCR tests. In contrast, only 38.46 percent of boosted people and 29.72 percent of vaccinated people were no longer contagious after that duration.

Furthermore, 93.75 percent of unvaccinated participants and 92.31 percent of boosted people were no longer contagious after 15 days. Meanwhile, just 78.38 percent of vaccinated people were no longer contagious after that period.

“We did not find large differences in the median duration of viral shedding among participants who were unvaccinated; those who were vaccinated, but not boosted; and those who were vaccinated and boosted,” the researchers wrote in their letter to the NEJM.

“Our data suggests that some persons who are infected with the omicron and delta SARS-CoV-2 variants shed culturable virus more than five days after symptom onset or an initial positive test.”

Natural immunity still effective against severe COVID after 14 months

A pre-print study in the Middle East also proved the superiority of natural immunity to vaccine immunity. Researchers in Qatar found that natural immunity remains 97 percent effective against COVID-19, even 14 months after primary infection.

In a pre-print study posted July 7 in medRxiv, the researchers from Qatar University found that unvaccinated people who survive a bout of COVID-19 had outstanding protection against severe COVID-19 disease or death caused by it.

The study authors looked at three earlier papers scrutinizing the Middle Eastern country’s unvaccinated population between February 2020 and June 2022. The July 7 paper sought to answer questions about the duration of natural immunity when faced with omicron and earlier strains.
@NaturalNewsMedia

?????? Read more ??????