???
32 vaccination errors reported for February 28.

13 other adverse events reported including a spontaneous abortion.

These are childhood only adverse events that are posted here unless stated otherwise.

When I looked through some of the adult adverse events today it was horrific.

In total there were 45 events reported for February 28.

I am going to do an analysis of the vaccination errors reported today. It looks as though most of them occurred at the same venue which is malfeasance in my opinion.

These 17 vaccination errors appeared to have occurred at the same vaccination clinic. I would be guessing that it was a mass school vaccination or teenage vaccination gathering where the inappropriate doses were administered. I say this because usually the case numbers vary widely but look at these numbers, they have all been submitted one after the other numerically indicating that the same person has entered them one after the other. This is horrific.

715334
715335
715337
715338
715339
715343
715344
715345
715346
715347
715348
715349
715350
715351
715352
715353
715354

Surely this must be investigated and people stood down. This must be a media story and parents must be made aware of this carelessness so they can make better informed decisions.

The screen shots are scattered in the previous two posts.

https://t.me/IdetectAsafetySignal/680

That is all the adverse events reports for children aged 5-17 for the entire month of February as published by the TGA. Approximately 700 adverse events were reported. Many of them very serious including the vaccination of 4 year olds, rectal haemorrhage, Bell’s Palsy, pericarditis, myocarditis, heart attacks, spontaneous abortion, blood in urine, decreased white blood cell counts, paraesthesia, tremor, seizure. Epileptic reactions, anaphylactic reactions, lymphoma, positive Covid tests, blindness, peripheral neuropathy, cyanosis, pericardial drainage, tic, tonic clonic seizures heart irregularities, vertigo, appendicitis, menstrual disorders and more.

Colloidal Silver

Colloidal Silver (CS). Silver has been used for thousands of years to treat ailments. The Greeks and Romans used it on wounds, many cultures put silver coins in milk bottles or water canteens, and doctors put it in babies’ eyes just a couple of generations ago.

Now we can have generators in our homes for $150 that make a pure, powerful colloidal silver (CS) that cost us virtually nothing and is very easy to make.

CS can stop cancer on its own in two ways, depending on the situation:

It kills cancer cells that it comes in contact with.

Or it causes cancer cells to revert back to normal cells.

CS also stops all known pathogens that it comes in contact with, whether they be viral, bacterial, or fungal. So if someone is drinking CS daily, their immune system is freed up to fight cancer or other ailments that the CS cannot reach. The trick is getting the CS in contact with the pathogens or cancer cells, so it is taken daily, as it does not stay in the body.

I would not usually recommend buying CS, as many products on the market are useless and expensive. Like anything else, you really need to know your source. The best choice by far is to make your own CS, as it is far more cost effective.

For more information about colloidal silver, there are a great many resources on the internet. However, as it is very difficult to find trusted sources, I will include some here.
Below is a technical article that is written by trusted experts:

http://silver-lightning.com/theory.html

And my favorite device is the Silverpuppy. I recommend and use this device from their store:

Silver 9″ Microprocessor Controlled Programmable CS Generator

I also recommend a thermal stirrer, as it helps to keep the silver rods cleaner, and keeps the temperature more stable during those cold winter months. A thermal stirrer is something like a coffee warmer, providing just a little warmth to the bottom of the jar, and it only needs to be a little warmer than the room temperature, so usually 25 – 30C works fine.

I also strongly recommend a nebulizer, as it is one of the best ways to get CS into the body. I have been using the Magicfly Ultrasonic Nebulizer for a couple of years.

If you have lung cancer, you might be very interested in this video.

Ions, not particles, make silver toxic to bacteria
Submitted by odecoyote on Sat, 01/07/2017 - 07:26
Mike Williams
– July 11, 2012Posted in: News Releases

SUMMARY: Rice researchers settle a long-standing controversy on the mechanism by which silver nanoparticles kill bacteria – and they find that using too little can help bacteria build immunity.

Jeff Falk
713-348-6775
jfalk@rice.edu

Mike Williams
713-348-6728
mikewilliams@rice.edu

Ions, not particles, make silver toxic to bacteria

Rice University researchers report too small a dose may enhance microbes’ immunity
HOUSTON – (July 11, 2012) – Rice University researchers have settled a long-standing controversy over the mechanism by which silver nanoparticles, the most widely used nanomaterial in the world, kill bacteria.

Their work comes with a Nietzsche-esque warning: Use enough. If you don’t kill them, you make them stronger.

Scientists have long known that silver ions, which flow from nanoparticles when oxidized, are deadly to bacteria. Silver nanoparticles are used just about everywhere, including in cosmetics, socks, food containers, detergents, sprays and a wide range of other products to stop the spread of germs.

But scientists have also suspected silver nanoparticles themselves may be toxic to bacteria, particularly the smallest of them at about 3 nanometers. Not so, according to the Rice team that reported its results this month in the American Chemical Society journal Nano Letters.

In fact, when the possibility of ionization is taken away from silver, the nanoparticles are practically benign in the presence of microbes, said Pedro Alvarez, George R. Brown Professor and chair of Rice’s Civil and Environmental Engineering Department.

“You would be surprised how often people market things without a full mechanistic understanding of their function,” said Alvarez, who studies the fate of nanoparticles in the environment and their potential toxicity, particularly to humans. “The prefix ‘nano’ can be a double-edged sword. It can help you sell a product, and in other cases it might elicit concerns about potential unintended consequences.”

He said the straightforward answer to the decade-old question is that the insoluble silver nanoparticles do not kill cells by direct contact. But soluble ions, when activated via oxidation in the vicinity of bacteria, do the job nicely.

To figure that out, the researchers had to strip the particles of their powers. “Our original expectation was that the smaller a particle is, the greater the toxicity,” said Zongming Xiu, a Rice postdoctoral researcher and lead author of the paper. Xiu set out to test nanoparticles, both commercially available and custom-synthesized from 3 to 11 nanometers, to see whether there was a correlation between size and toxicity.
“We could not get consistent results,” he said. “It was very frustrating and really weird.”
Xiu decided to test nanoparticle toxicity in an anaerobic environment – that is, sealed inside a chamber with no exposure to oxygen — to control the silver ions’ release. He found that the filtered particles were a lot less toxic to microbes than silver ions.
Working with the lab of Rice chemist Vicki Colvin, the team then synthesized silver nanoparticles inside the anaerobic chamber to eliminate any chance of oxidation. “We found the particles, even up to a concentration of 195 parts per million, were still not toxic to bacteria,” Xiu said. “But for the ionic silver, a concentration of about 15 parts per billion would kill all the bacteria present. That told us the particle is 7,665 times less toxic [to pathogens] than the silver ions, indicating a negligible toxicity.”

“The point of that experiment,” Alvarez said, “was to show that a lot of people were obtaining data that was confounded by a release of ions, which was occurring during exposure they perhaps weren’t aware of.”

Alvarez suggested the team’s anaerobic method may be used to test many other kinds of metallic nanoparticles for toxicity and could help fine-tune the antibacterial qualities of silver particles. In their tests, the Rice researchers also found evidence of hormesis; E. coli became stimulated by silver ions when they encountered doses too small to kill them.
“Ultimately, we want to control the rate of (ion) release to obtain the desired concentrations that just do the job,” Alvarez said. “You don’t want to overshoot and overload the environment with toxic ions while depleting silver, which is a noble metal, a valuable resource – and a somewhat expensive disinfectant. But you don’t want to undershoot, either.”

He said the finding should shift the debate over the size, shape and coating of silver nanoparticles. “Of course they matter,” Alvarez said, “but only indirectly, as far as these variables affect the dissolution rate of the ions. The key determinant of toxicity [to pathogens] is the silver ions. So the focus should be on mass-transfer processes and controlled-release mechanisms.”

“These findings suggest that the antibacterial application of silver nanoparticles could be enhanced and environmental impacts could be mitigated by modulating the ion release rate, for example, through responsive polymer coatings,” Xiu said.

Co-authors of the paper are postdoctoral researcher Qingbo Zhang and graduate student Hema Puppala, both in the lab of Colvin, Rice’s Kenneth S. Pitzer-Schlumberger Professor of Chemistry, a professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering and vice provost for research.

The work was supported by a joint U.S.-U.K. research program administered by the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.K.’s Natural Environment Research Council.

Read the abstract at http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl301934w
Related links:
Alvarez Group: http://alvarez.rice.edu/
Colvin Group: http://nanonet.rice.edu/
Images for download:

http://news.rice.edu/files/201....2/07/0713_SILVER-gra

Silver ions delivered by nanoparticles to bacteria promote lysis, the process by which cells break down and ultimately die, which makes silver nanoparticles a superior and widely used antibacterial agent. New research by Rice University found that silver ions, not the particles themselves, are toxic to bacteria. They also found that ligands in the vicinity of a bacteria can bind silver ions and prevent them from reaching their target. (Credit: Zongming Xiu/Rice University)

Located on a 300-acre forested campus in Houston, Rice University is consistently ranked among the nation’s top 20 universities by U.S. News & World Report. Rice has highly respected schools of Architecture, Business, Continuing Studies, Engineering, Humanities, Music, Natural Sciences and Social Sciences and is known for its “unconventional wisdom.” With 3,708 undergraduates and 2,374 graduate students, Rice’s undergraduate student-to-faculty ratio is 6-to-1. Its residential college system builds close-knit communities and lifelong friendships, just one reason why Rice has been ranked No. 1 for best quality of life multiple times by the Princeton Review and No. 4 for “best value” among private universities by Kiplinger’s Personal Finance. To read “What they’re saying about Rice,” go to www.rice.edu/nationalmedia/Rice.pdf.

If you do not wish to receive news releases from Rice University, reply to this email and write “unsubscribe” in the subject line.

Office of News and Media Relations – MS 300, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005

- See more at: http://news.rice.edu/2012/07/1....1/ions-not-particles

HANG ALL CRIMINALS.

14 year old male with Bell’s Palsy.
https://t.me/IdetectAsafetySignal

https://world-signals.com/news..../2022/03/17/american
#usa #america #china #taiwan #biolabs #biological #bioweapon
American biolabs in Taiwan?

So.... VIRUSES are junk ****s from broken dying cells.... no problem!

Ionic Colloidal Silver is so POWERFUL it kills viruses, bacteria, fungi, germs, basically anything that holds a charge that can attracts the silver ion to it and boy, does the silver does its job efficiently!

Look at some of the articles I collected detailing how POWERFUL silver is.

It is TIME for you to be DOCTOR TO YOURSELF, this way you are INDEPENDENT, and not at their ****ing mercy.

**** YOU DOCTORS FOR ****ING UP OUR LIVES WIT YOUR COVID LIES. YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE, YOU DAMNED CROOKS!

I HOPES YOUR CHILDREN BECOMES DEAF, THEN YOU'll KNOW THE MEANING OF MY DEAF RAGE!!!!!!

The Return of Silver in Healing: Colloidal Silver - Nature's Alternative to Antibiotics
From Health Newsline
http://educate-yourself.org/cs/csarticle1.shtml


In the early 1900's an antibacterial solution called Colloidal Silver became the choice of medical practitioners. It proved to be enormously effective against infectious organisms and extremely safe to use, without the negative side effects associated with drugs. But Colloidal Silver became increasingly expensive and the pharmaceutical companies developed antibiotics as we know them today. Silver took a back seat. However, as usual, as we deviate from nature, unforeseen problems develop. Forty years after the advent of antibiotics, many types of disease-causing organisms had built an immunity to their action.
Over the years the medical establishment has reported on the new strains of "Super Bugs" that cannot be destroyed by antibiotics. Newsweek Magazine reported in March 28, 1994 that in 1992, 13,000 hospital patients died of infections that resisted every drug doctors tried. Also a well known fact is the detrimental effect of antibiotics on the naturally occurring flora in the colon. Colloidal Silver does not disturb this very necessary environment.
Fortunately, the timely re-emergence of Colloidal Silver due to new technology and much reduced costs in production, may prove to be one of the best remedies that the public now has to protect themselves.
"And now it's silver that is finding wholly new uses as a wonder in modern medicine...perhaps it soon will be recognized as OUR MIGHTIEST GERM FIGHTER." (Science Digest, March 1978.) Silver is considered to be one of the most universal antibiotic substances known. Jim Powell reported in the Science Digest article quoted above, that an antibiotic kills perhaps 7 different disease organisms, but silver kills some 650. Resistant strains fail to develop. Moreover, silver is non-toxic!
The comeback of silver in medicine began in the 1970's. The late Dr. Carl Moyer, chairman of Washington University's Department of Surgery, received a grant to develop better treatment for burn victims. Dr. Harry Margraf of St. Louis, as the chief biochemist, worked with Dr. Moyer and other surgeons to find an antiseptic strong enough, yet safe, to use over larger areas of the body. Dr. Margraf reviewed 22 antiseptic compounds and found drawbacks in all of them. (SILVER IS USED IN ALL MAJOR BURN CENTERS IN THE UNITED STATES. UCLA MEDICAL LABS FOUND IT EFFECTIVE ON EVERY VIRUS THEY TESTED IT ON.)
He noted that many of these antibiotics were ineffective against a number of harmful bacteria, including the biggest killer in burn cases - greenish blue bacterium called Pseudomonas acruginose. Extensive trials proved silver to be the most effective and is currently used in all major burn centers in the United States.
In 1834, the German obstetrician F. Crede administered 1% silver nitrate to the eyes of newborn infants, virtually eliminating the incidence of disease causing blindness in newborn babies. however, it was not until the late 1800's that Western scientists were able to prove what had been known in Eastern medicine for thousands of years...that silver was a proven germ fighter! Once the discovery was made that the body's chief fluids were colloidal in nature, the endless possibilities which could occur from the use of colloids in medicine were recognized. As a result, a silver solution known as Colloidal Silver became widely used in medicine as one of the main-stays of antimicrobial treatment, until money became an issue. "What we actually have done, was rediscover that silver kills bacteria", stated Dr. Robert Becker M. D. "It is non-toxic in micro-concentrations of 3-5 parts per million."

12 year old girl with Bell’s Palsy.
https://t.me/IdetectAsafetySignal