Covid directives in NSW :
FEDERAL COURT ACTION UPDATE
Dear participants, clients and followers;
Thank you for being part of our journey to drive forward a number of critical legal claims.
Maatouks Law Group are driving forward these claims, in relation to the inconsistencies in the application of state and territory public health and emergency legislation, which has been applied upon large groups of individuals, with the mandating of medical intervention.
WE ARE SPEARHEADING THE FEDERAL COURT BIOSECURITY ACT 2015 ACTION
A federal court action seeking to quash Minister Hazzard’s mandatory Covid-19 vaccination orders in the NSW health sector, was filed in the Federal Court of Australia on 14 December 2021.
The Court judge has recently removed the action as a Class Action in order to deal with the matter quickly. Our lead Applicant is representative of the class, and we are proceeding with the case on separate questions; meaning that the issues will focus on the questions of law, rather than the evidence of the individual circumstances of the class. Therefore, any outcome will apply equally to everyone in any case, without it necessarily having to be labelled as a Class Action.
This is beneficial, as it will allow us to focus on the issues involving the legalities of mandating vaccines on groups of people, without an appropriate risk assessment and individualised orders.
We are pleased to advise; that the Federal Court matter will be heard tomorrow June 15th, 2022, at the Federal Court of Sydney, starting at 10.00am; the location is the Supreme Court Building in Phillip Street Sydney. The case will not be live streamed, however; if you are interested in attending in person, you are welcome to do so.
This compliments our NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal actions filed in October 2021, which we have recently won on appeal.
In summary, the Federal Court action claims:
The Minister was bound to act consistently with the provisions of the Federal Biosecurity Act 2015.
The Minister failed to act under a state emergency declaration when a national emergency declaration was in force and as he evidently considered there to be a biosecurity emergency situation in NSW.
The Minister failed to consider certain matters required by the federal Act before making the orders, including less restrictive and intrusive alternatives.
Had the Minister been given accurate advice on the key questions of the risk posed by Covid-19 and the vaccines, he would not have reasonably made the orders.
The Minister otherwise failed to act consistently with the requirements under the federal Act for imposing vaccination measures without personal orders, allowing for rights of review, or by infringing accepted standards for free and informed consent.
For all updates, please go to https://callpeter.com.au/our-class-actions/ and specifically the documents are linked on this page.
Thank you again for your ongoing support, and we hope that some of you can attend in person tomorrow.
Follow us on Telegram
