[ Photo ]
“The spell of the “war on terror” transforms civilians into collateral damage & monsters into heroes. Black and brown lives are cheap, disposable, not worth acknowledging or grieving.

It is where white men, drunk on their own saviour fantasy, come to see themselves as all-powerful, as untouchable.

Blooding there is something primal about the word. It has a dehumanising effect, reducing locals to animals to sacrifice for a higher purpose, in a coming-of-age ritual. “Blooding”, “warrior culture” and “Zulu” – the name some SAS units adopted – are steeped in histories of colonial violence.
Australians should be intimately familiar with these themes. After all, this nation has a prolific history of “blooding” rituals, dispossession & violence against native populations.

Perhaps the even more insidious part is how white men can kill at will, mutilate corpses, steal prosthetic body parts to drink beer from & still come away feeling like heroes.”

The cult of the military

https://t.me/gabbichoong (https://t.me/gabbichoong/1009)

[Forwarded from Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (Zelenko Protocol) (Zev Zelenko)]
Dr. Baric uses luciferase enzyme, which fluoresceses, as a method to confirm that mRNA is being produced. In other words, this technology can be used to ascertain if someone is vaccinated.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17037604/

@ZelenkoProtocol

[Forwarded from Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (Zelenko Protocol) (Zev Zelenko)]
Covid-19 was custom designed to destroy human lung tissue. Most of the research was done by Dr. Ralph Baric and funded by the US government.

2005
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p....mc/articles/PMC11494 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p....mc/articles/PMC11494/)/

2005
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16306622 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16306622/)/

2006
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p....mc/articles/PMC71241

2009
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19153232 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19153232/)/

2013
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23365422 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23365422/)/

2013
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23919993 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23919993/)/

Vladimir Zev Zelenko MD

Interesting?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/v8A7TM6MmK57/

Rep. Boebert introduces bill to end Biden’s “Ministry of Truth”

A scheme concocted by the Biden regime to actively police what people share on the internet is running into a snag, thanks to efforts by Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) to kill it before it even gets off the ground.

Legislation proposed by Boebert would defund the Department of Homeland Security‘s (DHS) new disinformation board, which has been tasked with eliminating “misinformation related to homeland security, focused specifically on irregular migration and Russia” from social media.

DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas recently appeared on fake news corporation CNN to reveal that the new disinformation unit will not have “operational authority,” but will rather “disseminate those best practices to the operators that have been executing and addressing this threat for years.”

Boebert wants to nip the thing in the bud before it ever gets launched, which she hopes to do by getting her new legislation passed as soon as possible.

“This kind of stuff is terrifying,” Boebert said during a Fox News segment about the Biden regime’s new Ministry of Truth. “We in Congress have the power of the purse. It is our duty to shut down this department immediately.”

“I’m calling on leadership in the Republican Party – Leader McCarthy, Whip Scalise, and others — to join me in calling for this department to be shut down and defunded.”

Boebert went on to state that not a single tax dollar should be used to fund any federal attempt at trampling the First Amendment and silencing the truth online “like Big Tech did with the Hunter Biden story.”

Biden’s pick to lead his Ministry of Truth says that free speech makes her “shudder”

Comparing the Biden regime’s Ministry of Truth to what George Orwell warned about in his famous book 1984, Boebert further chastised Democrats for taking that literary piece and using it as a guide rather than a warning.

“This really is a department of propaganda,” Boebert stated plainly about the situation. “To say that the federal department has a say in what’s right and what’s wrong. What’s truth and what is not. This is a very dangerous place that we’ve come to.”

Boebert is now looking for co-sponsors for her bill and is expected to introduce it officially in the next week.

Nina Jankowicz, the woman chosen to head up Biden’s new Ministry of Truth, has publicly stated that free speech makes her “shudder.” The use of this one word tells us everything we need to know about what will happen should the DHS be allowed to proceed with the agenda.

“She also ludicrously cited Christopher Steele as an expert on disinformation,” wrote Sean Adl-Tabatabai about Jankowicz’s errant positions.

“Steele was the author of the infamous Clinton campaign-funded Trump ‘peegate dossier’ that turned out to be an actual product of disinformation. Jankowicz previously called Elon Musk an ‘online abuser,’ while arguing for more censorship when she asserted, ‘The ‘free speech vs. censorship’ framing is a false dichotomy.'”

In the comment section at Newspunch, someone wrote that it is highly unlikely that mainstream RINO (Republican in Name Only) politicians wills support Boebert’s bill, which could kill it right out of the gate.

“As long as the Democrats control the Congress, I don’t hold out much hope that the bill will pass,” wrote another, skeptical about the likelihood of this actually moving forward.

“But I’m extremely doubtful that the Democrats will even allow the midterm elections to be held. They know that if the elections do take place, they will lose in a landslide … Therefore, I wouldn’t put it past these globalists to create a false flag event so they can declare martial law and suspend the elections.”

Join and share ?@NaturalNewsMedia

?????? Read the beginning of the article ??????

In other words, the high prevalence of parasitic diseases that result to stress on human health is likely to give rise to authoritative governance. The researchers also noted that this is consistent with previous research that studied conformist attitudes toward those who have experienced malnutrition, warfare and famine.

“A disease epidemic, or even the perceived threat of an epidemic, may lead to temporarily higher levels of conformity within populations and may dispose individuals within those populations to respond more harshly to normative transgressions,” the researchers said.

In taking one step back and examining the results of the studies, it is obvious that such a theory is proven right during the mask, social distancing and vaccine mandates that plagued the COVID pandemic.

https://www.brighteon.com/73ae....46b3-444b-4f52-a138-

Join and share ?@NaturalNewsMedia

We know :

PLANDEMIC: Decades of research show how TYRANNY thrives during global pandemics

Decades of research have shown how tyranny thrives during global pandemics. It is a natural phenomenon that relates to the type of government people are willing to accept in reaction to perceived threats.

One study that focuses on “parasite stress” hypothesis suggests that when a species faces parasites and diseases, its values are shaped by its experience. In the context of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the “parasite,” which is used to refer to any pathogenic organism including bacteria and viruses, is the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

The theory states that depending on how a disease stresses people’s development, it can lead to differences in mating preferences and changes in culture. Proponents of the theory also note that the disease can alter psychological and social norms.

According to this theory, authoritarian governments are more likely to emerge in regions that are characterized by the high prevalence of disease-causing pathogens. Researchers define such governance as highly concentrated power structures that repress dissent and emphasize submission to authority, social conformity and hostility toward outgroups.

This explains why governments around the world have employed fearmongering tactics on their own people.

The parasite stress theory also states that greater exposure to diseases is associated with higher ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination because of the threat that people from the outside will carry pathogens to which nobody is immune. Because of the invisible nature of these parasites, attempts to control the spread of diseases used to depend substantially on adherence to behavioral practices that helped reduce the risk of infection.

With conditions of threat from the disease, different group members are expected to increase their preference for ingroup association and have an increased awareness of their shared fate and interdependence. As the researchers found, society tends to promote a collectivist worldview, which means it favors the obedience and conformity of the population.

Parasite prevalence predicts measures of an authoritative government

In examining two different studies, it was shown in the first that “parasite prevalence” strongly predicted the likelihood of individuals to express authoritarian personalities. The second study, which focused on small-scale societies, also found that parasite prevalence predicted measures of authoritarian governance, and did so even when they are statistically controlling other threats to welfare.

According to the researchers, these results suggest that societal differences in governance result from cultural differences in the individuals’ authoritarian personalities. They also pointed out that individuals who dissent with the said “ritualized behavior” are seen as a threat to society.

The researchers wrote: “At a psychological level of analysis, empirical evidence reveals that the subjective perception of infection risk causes individuals to be more conformist, to prefer conformity and obedience in others, to respond more negatively toward others who fail to conform and to endorse more conservative socio-political attitudes.”

Moreover, the “societal level of analysis” says that in countries and cultures with a higher prevalence of diseases, people tend to be less individualistic and exhibit lower levels of dispositional openness to new things. They are also more likely to conform to the opinion of the majority.
@NaturalNewsMedia

?????? Read more ??????